GeForce 940MX vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 940MX and GeForce GTX 460 v2. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 940MX and GeForce GTX 460 v2. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 595% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 940MX has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 343 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce 940MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 8 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 940MX and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | GF114 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 10 March 2016 | 24 September 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 779 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 43.62 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | 75 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |