GeForce 940MX vs GRID K520
In this comparison between GeForce 940MX and GRID K520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 940MX will be the best choice, for others GRID K520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K520
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 878% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 940MX and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 377 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce 940MX and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1000 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 940MX and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 89% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 March 2016 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |