GeForce 940MX vs GRID M10 8Q
In this comparison between GeForce 940MX and GRID M10 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 940MX will be the best choice, for others GRID M10 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 878% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M10 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX and GRID M10 8Q are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 89 MHz higher, than GRID M10 8Q.
- GeForce 940MX and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 1200 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 940MX and GRID M10 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 57% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 16% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940MX | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 March 2016 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |