GeForce 940MX vs GRID M60 2Q
When comparing GeForce 940MX and GRID M60 2Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 940MX and GRID M60 2Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 2Q
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940MX | GRID M60 2Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 878% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M60 2Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 940MX has 2 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 2Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 565 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce 940MX and GRID M60 2Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 1012 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 91% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 264% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce 940MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940MX | GRID M60 2Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 10 March 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |