GeForce 940MX vs Radeon R7 M350
When comparing GeForce 940MX and Radeon R7 M350, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 940MX and Radeon R7 M350 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M350
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940MX | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M350 has 52% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 940MX and Radeon R7 M350 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 397 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GeForce 940MX and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon R7 M350. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940MX | Radeon R7 M350 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 10 March 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1 | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |