GeForce 940MX vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce 940MX and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 940MX and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940MX | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 878% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 940MX.
- GeForce 940MX is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 548 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce 940MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940MX in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940MX | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N16S-GTR-B/S | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 10 March 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |