GeForce 945A vs GeForce GTS 160M
In this comparison between GeForce 945A and GeForce GTS 160M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 945A will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTS 160M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 945A
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 945A | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce 945A.
- GeForce 945A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTS 160M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 945A and GeForce GTS 160M have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GeForce 945A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 945A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 428 MHz higher, than GeForce 945A.
- GeForce 945A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 160M - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2000% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 314% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945A in Dota 2 is 182% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945A in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945A in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 100−105 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945A in Minecraft is 88% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945A in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 945A | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | G9x |
Code name | GM108 | N10E-GS1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 384 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1189 MHz | |
Transistor count | 505 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 28.54 | 19 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | 192 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.0 | + |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |