GeForce 945A vs GeForce MX250
When choosing between GeForce 945A and GeForce MX250, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 945A and GeForce MX250.
GeForce 945A
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 945A | GeForce MX250 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 945A has 230% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce 945A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce MX250 uses PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 945A.
- GeForce 945A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX250 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 945A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce MX250 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 446 MHz higher, than GeForce 945A.
- GeForce 945A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX250 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 1988 MHz higher, than GeForce 945A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 945A and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 33% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce 945A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 945A | GeForce MX250 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Code name | GM108 | N17S-G2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 20 February 2019 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 1518 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1189 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.54 | 24.91 |
| Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 6.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |