GeForce 945M vs GeForce GTX 295
In this comparison between GeForce 945M and GeForce GTX 295 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 945M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 295 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce 945M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 945M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 945M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 945M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 285% more power consumption, than GeForce 945M.
- GeForce 945M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than GeForce 945M.
- GeForce 945M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 945M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 314 MHz higher, than GeForce 945M.
- GeForce 945M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 945M is 1001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 945M and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Dota 2 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Fortnite is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 945M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce 945M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 512 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1045 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 107 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |