FirePro W7170M vs GeForce 9800 GTX
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and GeForce 9800 GTX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others GeForce 9800 GTX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GeForce 9800 GTX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 40% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 9800 GTX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 508 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 9800 GTX - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GeForce 9800 GTX - with Tesla.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 965 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce 9800 GTX - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 3900 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7170M and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro W7170M and GeForce 9800 GTX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 296% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 468% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GeForce 9800 GTX | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Tesla |
| Code name | Tonga | G92 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 28 March 2008 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1688 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 754 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 43.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 432.1 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 70.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |