GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
In this comparison between GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800 GTX will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 86% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 158 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 219 mm longer, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 6900 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6600% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 692% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 786% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Architecture | Tesla | Turing |
| Code name | G92 | TU117 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 | no data |
| Pipelines | 128 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 229 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |