GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 760M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 760M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 9800 GTX stacks up against GeForce GTX 760M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 760M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 154% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 760M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 760M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GeForce GTX 760M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 1031 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760M is 900 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 148% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 760M | |
| Architecture | Tesla | Kepler |
| Code name | G92 | N14E-GL |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 | 30 May 2013 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 42.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 128 | 768 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | + |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |