GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 965M
In this comparison between GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 965M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800 GTX will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 965M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 965M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 744 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 965M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 1400 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 965M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 965M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 296% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 468% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 965M | |
| Architecture | Tesla | Maxwell |
| Code name | G92 | N16E-GS, N16E-GR |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 | 5 January 2015 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 944 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 2,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 73.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 128 | 1024 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | + |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |