GeForce 9800 GTX vs GRID M60 2Q
In this comparison between GeForce 9800 GTX and GRID M60 2Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800 GTX will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 2Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
GRID M60 2Q
Main Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | GRID M60 2Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- GRID M60 2Q has 60% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 2Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 510 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 1131 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GRID M60 2Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- GRID M60 2Q is 257 mm longer, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 3912 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | GRID M60 2Q | |
Architecture | Tesla | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | G92 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 28 March 2008 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 128 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | Via Adapter | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |