GeForce 9800 GTX vs Iris Graphics 6100
When choosing between GeForce 9800 GTX and Iris Graphics 6100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 9800 GTX and Iris Graphics 6100.
GeForce 9800 GTX
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 833% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 6100 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 6100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Iris Graphics 6100 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 1388 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 6100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 6100 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Iris Graphics 6100 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | G92 | Broadwell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 28 March 2008 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 128 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | Via Adapter | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |