GeForce 9800 GTX vs P104 100
In this comparison between GeForce 9800 GTX and P104 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800 GTX will be the best choice, for others P104 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
P104 100
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | P104 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 508 GB more memory, than P104 100.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 81 MHz higher, than P104 100.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- P104 100 is 257 mm longer, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 8908 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | P104 100 | |
| Architecture | Tesla | Pascal |
| Code name | G92 | GP104 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 | 12 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 208.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |