GeForce 9800 GTX vs Quadro 2000D
In this comparison between GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800 GTX will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
Quadro 2000D
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 511 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 1063 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Quadro 2000D is 168 mm longer, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Tesla | Fermi |
| Code name | G92 | GF106 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 178 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |