GeForce 9800 GTX vs Quadro 4000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro 4000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 9800 GTX stacks up against Quadro 4000M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 9800 GTX
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro 4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 40% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 1213 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000M is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro 4000M | |
Architecture | Tesla | Fermi |
Code name | G92 | Fermi |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 March 2008 | 22 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 128 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 475 MHz |
Transistor count | 754 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 26.60 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | Via Adapter | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |