GeForce 9800 GTX vs Quadro K2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro K2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro K2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 9800 GTX
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro K2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 154% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 943 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 700 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 69% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 96% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro K2000M | |
Architecture | Tesla | Kepler |
Code name | G92 | N14P-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 March 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 128 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 754 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 23.84 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | Via Adapter | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |