GeForce 9800 GTX vs Quadro T2000 mobile
In this comparison between GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro T2000 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800 GTX will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
Quadro T2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 133% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T2000 mobile uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 mobile - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Quadro T2000 mobile - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 113 MHz higher, than Quadro T2000 mobile.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 mobile is 6900 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro T2000 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and Quadro T2000 mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 mobile in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Quadro T2000 mobile | |
Architecture | Tesla | Turing |
Code name | G92 | N19P-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 March 2008 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 128 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 114.2 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | Via Adapter | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon HD 4810
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon R8 M365DX
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 4810
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R8 M365DX
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon R9 380X
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon R9 380X
- Quadro T2000 mobile vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire