GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon R7 M270
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 9800 GTX stacks up against Radeon R7 M270, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 9800 GTX
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 863 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Architecture | Tesla | GCN |
| Code name | G92 | Opal XT / Mars |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |