GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
When comparing GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Radeon RX 460 mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Radeon RX 460 mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Radeon RX 460 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Radeon RX 460 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI or Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
130 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 136% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 508 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 5200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 185% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
9−10
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
100−105
180−190
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
60−65
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−33
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 83% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
7−8
20−22
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
9−10
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 116% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
80−85
high / 1080p
10−11
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−11
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
10−11
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
21−24
60−65
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 44% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
NB9E-GT2
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
15 July 2008
8 August 2016
Pipelines
192
896
Core clock speed
500 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
66.08
Floating-point performance
2,115 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
SLI options
+
Laptop size
large
large
Check Price
Check Price
