GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 83% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 509 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 74 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 214% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−105 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 128% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 171% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
| Code name | NB9E-GT2 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |