GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 506 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 74 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2332 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Minecraft is 12% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GT SLI in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
| Code name | NB9E-GT2 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |