GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs Tesla M60
When choosing between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Tesla M60.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 130% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 504 GB more memory, than Tesla M60.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M60 is 57 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 4212 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 514% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 461% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 324% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 273% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 388% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 476% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 48% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GT SLI | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | G9x | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | NB9E-GT2 | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 July 2008 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |