GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800M GTS SLI will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GTS SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI has 15% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI has 511 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 250 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is manufactured by 55/65 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 982 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Battlefield 5 is 250% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Dota 2 is 30% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Fortnite is 65% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Minecraft is 28% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 900% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Code name | NB9E-GT | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55/65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |