GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs GRID M60 2Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and GRID M60 2Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 9800M GTS SLI stacks up against GRID M60 2Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 2Q
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GTS SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | GRID M60 2Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI has 510 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 2Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is 43 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is manufactured by 55/65 nm process technology, and GRID M60 2Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 4212 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 308% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 257% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 508% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | GRID M60 2Q | |
Architecture | G9x | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | NB9E-GT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 July 2008 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 128 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55/65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
- GRID M60 2Q vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs GeForce GTX 670
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Radeon HD 7970
- GRID M60 2Q vs GeForce GTX 670
- GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon HD 7970