GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 9800M GTS SLI stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GTS SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 58% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI has 506 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is manufactured by 55/65 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 2188 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 185% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 116% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
Code name | NB9E-GT | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 July 2008 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 128 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55/65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs GeForce GTX 590
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost