FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
When comparing FirePro M4150 and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce 9800M GTX SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 215 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M4150 and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Dota 2 is 50% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Fortnite is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in World of Tanks is 38% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce 9800M GTX SLI | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Code name | Opal | NB9E-GTX |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 15 July 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 224 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3016 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |