FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
FireStream 9270
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce 9800M GTX SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
- FireStream 9270 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 250 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 85% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and GeForce 9800M GTX SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Dota 2 is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Fortnite is 57% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in World of Tanks is 28% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce 9800M GTX SLI | |
Architecture | TeraScale | G9x |
Code name | RV770 | NB9E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 15 July 2008 |
Pipelines | 800 | 224 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 500 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3016 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |