GeForce GT 440 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between GeForce GT 440 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 440 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 440
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GT 440 has 333% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GT 440 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GT 440 has 480 GB more memory, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GT 440 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
GeForce GT 440 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 440 is 1320 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GT 440 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−33
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 440 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
150−160
medium / 768p
27−30
120−130
ultra / 1080p
7−8
60−65
QHD / 1440p
−
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than GeForce GT 440.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 440 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
10−11
65−70
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GT 440.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
0−1
30−35
medium / 768p
−
20−22
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
high / 768p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 140% more, than GeForce GT 440.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 440
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
GF108
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
1 February 2011
3 January 2017
Pipelines
96
48
Core clock speed
1620 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
585 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
13.0 billion/sec
55.20
Floating-point performance
311.04 gflops
883 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
20 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Standard memory config per GPU
1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Check Price
Check Price