GeForce GT 440 vs Quadro K2000M
In this comparison between GeForce GT 440 and Quadro K2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 440 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 440
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GT 440 has 18% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GT 440 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GT 440 has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GT 440 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GT 440 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 440 is 875 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GT 440 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 440.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
1−2
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GT 440.
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 440 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
60−65
120−130
medium / 768p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
high / 768p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GeForce GT 440.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GT 440.
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
10−12
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
0−1
8−9
low / 768p
18−20
40−45
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
1−2
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
5−6
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
high / 1080p
27−30
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 69% more, than GeForce GT 440.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GT 440.
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
6−7
low / 768p
0−1
12−14
medium / 768p
−
8−9
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
16−18
high / 768p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 96% more, than GeForce GT 440.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 440
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
GF108
N14P-Q3
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 February 2011
1 June 2012
Pipelines
96
384
Core clock speed
1620 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
585 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
13.0 billion/sec
23.84
Floating-point performance
311.04 gflops
572.2 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
20 Mh/s
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Standard memory config per GPU
1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Check Price
Check Price
