GeForce GT 440 vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between GeForce GT 440 and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 440 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 440
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M3000M has 15% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 440.
GeForce GT 440 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GT 440 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
GeForce GT 440 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GT 440 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 440 is 570 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
GeForce GT 440 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3400 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 440.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
1−2
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
60−65
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 440 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
250−260
medium / 768p
27−30
220−230
ultra / 1080p
7−8
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
16−18
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce GT 440.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GT 440 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
120−130
medium / 768p
10−11
110−120
ultra / 1080p
0−1
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
0−1
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
21−24
180−190
medium / 1080p
0−1
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
0−1
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
low / 768p
18−20
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
0−1
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
75−80
130−140
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GT 440.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
0−1
130−140
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
high / 768p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce GT 440.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 440
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
GF108
GM204
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 February 2011
2 October 2015
Pipelines
96
1,024
Core clock speed
1620 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
585 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
13.0 billion/sec
67.20
Floating-point performance
311.04 gflops
2,150 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.2
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
20 Mh/s
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Standard memory config per GPU
1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
Check Price
Check Price