GeForce GT 440 vs Tesla C2050

When comparing GeForce GT 440 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 440 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GT 440 Check Price

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	GeForce GT 440	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x DVI
	Check Price

Tesla C2050 has 266% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 440.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GT 440 has 509 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GT 440 and Tesla C2050 are build with Fermi architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 440 is 1046 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
GeForce GT 440 and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 243 mm longer, than GeForce GT 440.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1400 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 440.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 440.
low / 768p	60−65	220−230
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	70−75
4K / 2160p	−	35−40
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than GeForce GT 440.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
GeForce GT 440 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	35−40
low / 768p	18−20	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GT 440.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	65−70
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GT 440.

Full Specs

	GeForce GT 440	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi
Code name	GF108	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	1 February 2011	25 July 2011
Pipelines	96	448
Core clock speed	1620 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	585 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	13.0 billion/sec	32.14
Floating-point performance	311.04 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth		144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0
CUDA cores	96
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	20 Mh/s	90 Mh/s
Standard memory config per GPU	1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
	Check Price

GeForce GT 440 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares