GeForce GT 445M vs GeForce GTX 295
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 445M and GeForce GTX 295. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 445M and GeForce GTX 295. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GT 445M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 445M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 445M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 445M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1792 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 725% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 445M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1789 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 445M.
- GeForce GT 445M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 445M is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 62 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 445M.
- GeForce GT 445M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 445M is 251 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 445M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 31% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 445M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N11E-GE | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 144 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 1180 MHz | 1242 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 10.6 billion/sec | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 339.8 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 144 | 480 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | + |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |