GeForce GT 445M vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 445M and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 445M stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GT 445M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 445M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 445M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 445M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 580% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 445M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 445M and Tesla C2050 have maximum RAM of 3 GB.
- GeForce GT 445M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 445M and Tesla C2050 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 445M is 606 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GT 445M and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1750 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 445M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 700% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 253% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 633% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 204% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1133% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1000% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 445M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N11E-GE | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 144 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1180 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 10.6 billion/sec | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 339.8 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |