GeForce GT 545 vs GeForce GTS 160M
In this comparison between GeForce GT 545 and GeForce GTS 160M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 545 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTS 160M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 545
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 545 | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 545 has 16% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 545 has 1535 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GT 545 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 545 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 780 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 545.
- GeForce GT 545 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 160M - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in Minecraft is 69% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | − |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 545 | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | G9x |
Code name | GF116 | N10E-GS1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 14 May 2011 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 144 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 505 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.28 | 19 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops | 192 gflops |
Length | 145 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | 51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |