GeForce GT 545 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 545 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 545 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GT 545
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 545 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 128 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GT 545 has 55% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GT 545 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 545 has 1408 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GT 545 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 545 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 545 is 520 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GT 545 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 545 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 545 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 70% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GT 545. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 545 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GF116 | Haswell GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 May 2011 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 144 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.28 | 52.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 545 vs HD Graphics P530
- GeForce GT 545 vs GeForce 920MX
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs HD Graphics P530
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 920MX
- GeForce GT 545 vs Radeon RX 550X
- GeForce GT 545 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book