GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro 2000D
When comparing GeForce GT 640M LE and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 640M LE and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
GeForce GT 640M LE is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M LE is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M LE here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 640M LE | Quadro 2000D | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 62 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 210% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 640M LE has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is build with Fermi / Kepler architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 800 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M LE in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M LE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 640M LE | Quadro 2000D | |
Architecture | Fermi / Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13P-LP | GF106 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 5 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.1 |
CUDA cores | Up to 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 14 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |