GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro FX 4800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 640M LE and Quadro FX 4800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 640M LE stacks up against Quadro FX 4800, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce GT 640M LE is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M LE is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M LE here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 640M LE | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is build with Fermi / Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 640M LE is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M LE in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M LE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 640M LE | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Fermi / Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N13P-LP | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | Up to 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 14 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |