GeForce GT 640M LE vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between GeForce GT 640M LE and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 640M LE and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GT 640M LE is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M LE is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M LE here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 640M LE | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1025% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is build with Fermi / Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- GeForce GT 640M LE is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1332 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M LE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M LE in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M LE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 50% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 100% more, than GeForce GT 640M LE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 640M LE | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Fermi / Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13P-LP | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | Up to 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 14 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |