FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GT 640M
In this comparison between FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 640M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 640M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7100
GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | GeForce GT 640M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 1150% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7100 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 640M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 640M - with Kepler.
- FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 640M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 640M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 640M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than GeForce GT 640M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | GeForce GT 640M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tonga | N13P-GS |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 645 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 - 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | 18 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |