GeForce GT 640M vs GeForce GTX 295
When choosing between GeForce GT 640M and GeForce GTX 295, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 640M and GeForce GTX 295.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 640M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1792 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 803% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
- GeForce GT 640M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M.
- GeForce GT 640M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- GeForce GT 640M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 640M is 801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 640M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N13P-GS | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 8 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 645 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 896 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 384 | 480 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | + |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |