GeForce GT 640M vs Radeon R9 370
In this comparison between GeForce GT 640M and Radeon R9 370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 640M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 370
GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 640M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 243% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 640M and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GT 640M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- GeForce GT 640M and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 3800 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 640M and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GT 640M and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than GeForce GT 640M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 640M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N13P-GS | Trinidad |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 645 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |