GeForce GT 640M vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce GT 640M and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 640M and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 640M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 603% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
- GeForce GT 640M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M.
- GeForce GT 640M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- GeForce GT 640M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1332 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 71% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 53% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 640M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N13P-GS | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 645 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |