GeForce 820A vs GeForce GT 645M
When choosing between GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 645M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 645M.
GeForce 820A
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GT 645M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 645M has 113% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 645M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 645M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 645M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 645M - with Kepler.
- GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 645M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 645M is 1800 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 645M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GT 645M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | − | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GT 645M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF117 | N13P-GS |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 22.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 544.5 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 820A vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce 820A vs Quadro 500M
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro 500M
- GeForce 820A vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce 820A vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX