GeForce GT 645M vs GRID M10 8Q
In this comparison between GeForce GT 645M and GRID M10 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 645M will be the best choice, for others GRID M10 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 645M | GRID M10 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 603% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- GeForce GT 645M and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3400 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 186% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 420% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 57% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 645M | GRID M10 8Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N13P-GS | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion/sec | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX
- GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 950M
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 850M
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 950M
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 850M