GeForce GT 645M vs GRID M60 8Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 645M and GRID M60 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 645M stacks up against GRID M60 8Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 8Q
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 645M | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 603% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- GeForce GT 645M and GRID M60 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 460% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 645M and GRID M60 8Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 293% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 462% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 1000% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 65% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 645M | GRID M60 8Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N13P-GS | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion/sec | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.2 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |