GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
In this comparison between GeForce GT 645M and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 645M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro W5500M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 645M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 165% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 10200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 320% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 371% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 106% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 206% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 645M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | N13P-GS | Navi 14 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1408 |
Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion/sec | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GT 1030
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon RX 540
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs GeForce GT 1030
- Radeon Pro W5500M vs Radeon RX 540