GeForce GT 645M vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 645M and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 645M stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 645M | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 643% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 133% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 110% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 253% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 450% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 475% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 645M | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13P-GS | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M